We all turn to things like the news to tell us what's going on in our communities and around the world. However, if you ask most people, they'll tell you that they turn on the news to hear and see factual, objective information. Journalists and the news media should NOT be allowed to express their biased/political opinions without a limit. Yes, they have just as equal a right to free speech as any other citizen, but the only difference is that when they are working as journalists, part of the job description is to be objective, not subjective
However, nowadays that isn't always the case. Some members of the news media do tend to carry their opinions on their sleeves. Viewers are smart enough to make their own judgements and create their own opinions based on FACTS presented by the news media.
I would totally agree with a ratings system or an on-screen message for news that would inform the viewer whether opinions were being represented or pure factual information. This would be a great way of ensuring that viewers were not manipulated into taking in peoples' opinions as facts.
However, when it comes to celebrities and other personalities, I think as long as they are in no way related to the news media or any other organization that claims to tell the “news”, they should definitely be able to express their opinions, both biased & political. Why? BECAUSE WE'RE A NATION THAT CLAIMS TO HAVE FREE SPEECH. And free speech is what defines us as a democratic country.
So in 2003, Natalie Maines of the Dixie Chicks diecided to use that right of free speech. At a concert in London, England, she told the audience while laughing, “"Just so yo
Songs aren't news; they have the opinions, feelings and emotions of the artist(s) embedded in them. The Dixie Chicks weren't the only non-news media related celebrities that spoke out politically against George Bush, the president of the United States.
During a live Hurricane K
Many other artists have written protest songs. Pink and the very popular Rolling Stones are just some examples from the recent past. However, it's important to note that Pink's song has unofficially been banned from American radio stations and DJ's have been told not to talk about her song if if she's a guest on their show. TALK ABOUT CENSORSHIP! This all sends out a message to the public that says that you really don't have the right to free speech as much as you think you do and if you use your right to free speech and go against the majority belief, there could be consequences.
Protest songs aren't a new trend at all. There have been many in the past. In the sixites, youth culture was defined by protest songs. They were well recieved too. Just take Edwin Starr's 'War' for example. it rose to become the United States' #1 song in 1970. Another proetst song of the past is Bob Marley and Wailers 'Get Up, Stand Up' (1973), rebelling against opression and Phil Ochs' 'I Ain't Marching Anymore'(1965) , rebelling against war. Check out this list of even more past protest songs:
http://www.spinner.com/2007/07/13/20-protest-songs-that-mattered-no-20/.
All in all, do I think that there should be NO limit to free speech? The answer: no. There should be certain limits as are already in place such as no hate speech (e.g. racist and sexist comments) and things of that extent. But expressing our feelings about the government should not be limited...because isn't that what a democratic government is all about?
Froomkin, Dan. Was Kanye West Right? 13 Sep. 2005. 15 June 2008 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2005/09/13/BL2005091300884_pf.html.
Edgers, Geoff . Protest Singers Renew Their Cry. 16 Apr. 2006. 15 June 2008
Unknown artist. “Dixie Chicks' album.” No date. Online image. 8notes.com. 15 June 2008.
Unknown artist. “Pink-the singer.” No date. Online image. EnjoyFrance.com. 15 June 2008Unknown artist. “Kanye West singing.” No date. Online image. DirectNews. 15 June 2008.
No comments:
Post a Comment